I am very new

I am extremely new to blogging – in fact I am new to the internet! …having my own businesses for 25 years left me little or no time to browse the web. I did start a blog in 2010 when my internet was first connected, but, I am ashamed to say I lost it somewhere! Ive lost worse things….in fact I have lost everything. The HMRC have taken my whole lifes work away from me….even took my Bath and my wedding ring for good measure! – my clothes, pictures…..pretty much everything. and despite 5 long years of fighting to get justice…..they banned me from ringing or writing to them  ever again (on trumped up claims that I swore at them)…unbelievable? nope.


One thought on “I am very new

  1. Patrick Cullinane

    Dear Phillip Inman, Victims and Others,

    What HMRC did to this woman; they did exactly the same to me = ROBBED me of EVERYTHING with the assistance of THIRTEEN High Court Judges who ignored due process via the Law of the Land: = ORGANISED CRIME: –

    The reports and comments below are self-explanatory and needs the oxygen of publicity to blow this FRAUD and CORRUPTION wide open in order that PARLIAMENT is FORCED to address our grievances.

    I will be passing on THIS case to Phillip Inman of the Guardian, as I was speaking at length to him on 29 August 2013 re government organisations, like HMRC, framing us up, and High Court Judges operating COMMERCIAL Kangaroo Courts ruling on our cases, with NO jurisdiction whatsoever – Which is ORGANISED CRIME against We the People.

    The injustice of all this is eating me away with anger, hopelessness and stress, what these criminals have done to me, while operating outside of the Law of the Land. The Inland Revenue (IR) had NO evidence whatsoever against me. Then, why was I made Bankrupt, and lost my HOME and worldly POSSESSIONS? The CABAL that were involved in this blatant FRAUD are NOW blocking me from getting Natural Justice. It is worse than devastating; it is CRIMES against HUMANITY and GENOCIDE: –

    My house was sold for OVER £100,000 below its value. It was a FOUR bedroomed house, not THREE bedroomed, as the Guardian states: –

    By Phillip Inman on Saturday 20 January 2001
    Three times a loser

    Final costs treble for man left bankrupt by the Inland Revenue. Phillip Inman reports

    Mr Cullinane has denied the charges, saying that income he received was money owed by a previous employer and social security payments. He had only one kitchen and bathroom, he says. Despite his denials, the Revenue pressed ahead with a bankruptcy order to recover the tax. It has subsequently conceded that all the money going through Mr Cullinane’s bank account was either taxed at source or not liable for tax, but maintains that he must have received rental income by other means.

    Mr Cullinane has attempted on several occasions to force the Revenue to disclose what evidence there is to support this assertion, but it has so far refused.

    The Taxpayers Charter has proved little help in his campaign to view his tax file. Mr Cullinane’s supporters have even offered to pay the Revenue any administration costs it might incur collecting the information, but to no avail.

    Where the money went

    Receipts and payments account in the bankruptcy for the period from June 6,1997 to November 2000

    Official Receiver’s disbursements £527.35

    Mortgage redemption £26,128.19

    Cheque/payable order fees £7.80

    Secretary of State fees £10,313.23

    Petitioner’s costs £2,188.66

    Trustees fees £32,306.65

    Trustee’s expenses £2,800.21

    Irrecoverable VAT £10,229.66

    Agents/valuers fees £8,886.22

    Agents fees £1,765.17

    Legal fees £13,749.25

    Other property expenses £15.00

    Insurance of assets £54.43

    Inland Revenue preferential claim £393.87

    Inland Revenue unsecured claim £17,634.31

    Total: £127,000.00

    Receipts from property: £127,000.00

    Balance: Nil

    KPMG, my Trustee in Bankruptcy, did destruction and damage to me and my property, as my GUARDIAN: –

    Magna Carta 1215 – TREASURES IN FULL
    (4) The guardian of the land of an heir who is under age shall take from it only reasonable revenues, customary dues, and feudal services. He shall do this without destruction or damage to men or property. If we have given the guardianship of the land to a sheriff, or to any person answerable to us for the revenues, and he commits destruction or damage, we will exact compensation from him, and the land shall be entrusted to two worthy and prudent men of the same ‘fee’, who shall be answerable to us for the revenues, or to the person to whom we have assigned them. If we have given or sold to anyone the guardianship of such land, and he causes destruction or damage, he shall lose the guardianship of it, and it shall be handed over to two worthy and prudent men of the same ‘fee’, who shall be similarly answerable to us.

    As my Trustee in Bankruptcy, why did KPMG fail to get a disclosure of the Inland Revenue’s case against me to protect my interests and PROPERTY, as my GUARDIAN? Because KPMG was in on the FRAUD and I had NO case to answer, as I had OVERPAID my TAX on an EMERGENCY P.A.Y.E. Tax Code and, I had NO rental income. I requested thirteen High Court Judges to order a disclosure of the Inland Revenue’s case against me, but they refused, as they were ALL part of the CABAL, against me, to pervert the course of justice for monetary gain.

    The Inland Revenue claimed, it was an ‘INFORMANT’ that told them, I had rental income, but the IR will NOT name the informant. How can anyone prove a NEGATIVE against HEARSAY gossip; when the Inland Revenue was NOT required to produce EVIDENCE? – When the burden of PROOF lies with the PLAINTIFF? Thirteen High Court Judges denied me a disclosure and copper-fastened this blatant FRAUD. While my Trustee in Bankruptcy, KPMG, remained silent and failed to challenge the FRAUD and abuse of process, as my GUARDIAN.

    Please Note: The UK is a Common Law jurisdiction and NOT a Judge or Magistrates’ jurisdiction: –

    Due process is the legal requirement that the state must respect all of the legal rights that are owed to a person. Due process balances the power of law of the land and protects individual persons from it. When a government harms a person without following the exact course of the law, (via Trial by Jury) this constitutes a due-process violation, which offends against the rule of law.

    Magna Carta (1215) {Article 38} reads: “In future no official shall put anyone to trial merely on his own testimony, without reliable witnesses produced for this purpose.”

    {Article 39} reads: “No freeman shall be arrested or imprisoned or deprived of his freehold or outlawed or banished or in any way ruined, nor will we take or order action against him, except by the lawful judgment of his equals (Trial by Jury) and according to the law of the land.”

    {Article 40} reads: “To no one will we sell, to no one will we deny or delay Right or Justice.”

    Therefore, the Rule of Judge or Magistrate is NOT the Rule of Law! – It is TREASON!

    hearsay rule n. the basic rule that testimony or documents which quote persons not in court are not admissible. Because the person who supposedly knew the facts is not in court to state his/her exact words, the trier of fact cannot judge the demeanor and credibility of the alleged first-hand witness, and the other party’s lawyer cannot cross-examine (ask questions of) him or her.

    With NO proof whatsoever to start with; how did HMRC PROVE each element of their claim? = All FRAUD & CORRUPTION: –

    Civil law
    In civil law cases, the “burden of proof” requires the plaintiff to convince the trier of fact (whether judge or jury) of the plaintiff’s entitlement to the relief sought. This means that the plaintiff must prove each element of the claim, or cause of action, in order to recover.

    Yes, KPMG wrote the RULEBOOK alright and gave it to me STRAIGHT UP without any SUGAR COATING: – I am still in AGONY today over what these COLLUDING CRIMINALS did to me. And worse still, We the People, have NO Members’ of Parliament or Common Law Courts of Law in the United Kingdom to rectify the DESTRUCTION and DAMAGE done to us in these COMMERCIAL Kangaroo Courts:

    KPMG: Do you want it sugar coated or straight up?
    Graduate Careers in Consulting – apply now, start September 2013

    We want to give it to you straight and not sugar coat it.

    Being a Consultant at KPMG sometimes means you’re the one writing the rulebook. That’s why an inquiring mind and plenty of agility is so important in this area of our business.

    It’s all about preparing for every possible eventuality and understanding that sometimes, you just have to think on your feet.

    If you don’t want our courts and the UK run by the Legal and Judicial Mafia; then please sign my Pledge and We the People will RESTORE the Rule of Law in the UK:

    Pledge “Trial-by-Jury”
    “I, Patrick Cullinane, will demonstrate outside the Royal Courts of In-Justice for FOUR days, starting Tue 1st October 2013, to RESTORE the Rule of Law and banish the Rule of JUDGES from the Kangaroo Courts in the UK but only if 150 other people from the UK will do the same. We the People in the UK have been denied our GUARANTEED RIGHTS to due-process via the Common Law Trial by Jury, which is the Law of the Land.”
    — Patrick Cullinane, Common Law Lawyer & Caseworker for IBRG (contact)
    Deadline to sign up by: 25th September 2013
    200 people have signed up (50 over target)
    Country: United Kingdom

    Thanks in advance for your support.

    Yours truthfully,

    Patrick Cullinane, Common Law Lawyer and Victim of the UK’s COMMERCIAL Kangaroo Courts.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s